On Tuesday 30 September 2003 08:34, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > Let's say I somehow missed 10 people, or even 100 people, for each > one I did see. Doubtful, since I get all the list traffic just like > everyone else, but just for kicks and giggles. We then have 1,000 > (the 10-or-so I saw times 100) who are leaving immediately, and > another 2000 or so who are going to make sure they cover their backs > by knowing what the competition offers at this point. Don't forget that there are MANY more uses of Red Hat that don't post to this list... > Considering the many thousands of people on this list, that's still a > small fraction. My reading of this whole discussion is that most > people would want a longer EOL for Fedora, but that otherwise it's > wait and see for now. A good many of them could be waiting to see what we do with the Fedora Legacy project, a community effort to extend the EOL for Fedora, for key packages that really deserve attention. Extending that EOL from ~9 months to 1.5 years or so falls right into that missing area between Fedora and RHEL. -- Jesse Keating RHCE MCSE http://geek.j2solutions.net Mondo DevTeam (http://www.microwerks.net/~hugo/) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
