Re: The end of RHL for private use? [was: Fedora vs. RHL]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John Haxby said:
> Martin Stricker wrote:
>
>>Both at work and at home I want a stable and reliable system with a long
>>lifespan. Fast changes are dangerous! If I wanted that, I'd go for
>>Mandrake or S.u.S.E... Currently I run RHL 7.3 in both places, which now
>>need to be replaced because errata support ends. Fedora isn't an option.
>>Red hat Enterprise might be an option at work, but with the bad economy
>>the budget is very tight. I'm not saying Red Hat is too expensive, but
>>there is Debian...
>>
>>
> I may be wrong, but didn't I read somewhere that RHEL *sources* would be
> freely available for download (by which I understood src rpms) which
> means that it wouldn't be beyond someone, a lot of people in fact, to
> maintain a binary version of RHEL built from source.

Sources have been available from the beginning.

http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/

-- 
William Hooper


-- 
Shrike-list mailing list
Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux