On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, John Haxby wrote: > Res wrote: > > >Yeah, but the fact we have to reboot is a killer, these servers are full > >of drives, that takes 30mins to fsck after an unclean, your way is most > >likely better than what we did, but it still meant that server had a mean > >downtime, oh well....i spose it wont have to run fsck again for a long > >time :) > > > > > With ext3 at maybe 5 seconds per journal, that's 360 disks -- that's a > huge machine. I'm impressed. Unless you're forcing an fsck and not > letting the journal do what it's there for or not using ext3. its not that big, but from memory its faster in checking than ext2, but certainly not done in 'seconds' -- Res - Network Solutions: clueless f'wits who dont care whos business they damage through their incompetance, which is the ONLY thing they excel at. -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
