It's the drivers thing. I wouldn't generalise that statement. Example. My Linux box prints superior photographs on HP Deskjet 940C than Windows XP. Furthermore, for some strange reason Windows keep recognising this piece of hardware again and again, every time I log in, and reports that it was unable to install it! The printer is connected via USB, and it's in fact already installed on XP. How about that? No nonsense of that kind in Linux, regardless of LPR or CUPS. On pet, 2003-07-18 at 10:34, Neil Bird wrote: > Around about 17/07/2003 19:50, John Haxby typed ... > > You really should sort out printing under Linux -- it's come on in leaps > > and bounds recently. In fact I tend to get better support for printing > > under Linux than I do under Windows now. > > On that subject, I do find printing under Linux to be prety much a > charm now. > > The only fly in the ointment for me is not-so-nice photo printing. > It works, and quite well, but it seems ... 'grubbier' somehow compared > to the Epson 'Doze drivers. > > I recall coming across a 'output colour fine tuning' page for Linux > printing, but I'll be blowed if I can find (== google) it now. > > Anyone recall this, or know of an equivalent? > > -- > [neil@xxx ~]# rm -f .signature > [neil@xxx ~]# ls -l .signature > ls: .signature: No such file or directory > [neil@xxx ~]# exit -- Igor Nestorovic University of Belgrade Faculty of Economics http://jung.ekof.bg.ac.yu ICQ# 31079000
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
