On Monday 26 May 2003 07:48, Igor NestoroviÄ shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Back to licencing. All right, they don't need to be included in official > release, but, hey, can something be worked out here? Some EXTRA ISO, > "unofficial", or something? IMVHO, the answer to that would be a flat-out "NO". The Thompson licencing terms for mpeg is confusing enough, sufficient to make Red Hat wary of possible (future) legal suits. As if that weren't bad enough, SCO is now muddying the waters even more, with their recent actions. For some further insight, see: http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0,10801,81488,00.html cheers, Elton ;-) -- http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/stats/team/team_4504.html "You only live once, so let's make life EASIER for each other." LINUX Registered User #193975. AMD-K7 ATHLON CPU power on board.
