Le 2003.05.01 20:03, Jeremy Portzer a écrit?:
On Wed, 2003-04-30 at 19:42, seth vidal wrote:
>
> >
> > Oh. Good point. That is "the advantage" I spoke of regarding
learning
> > vi. It isn't going anywhere. But what a shame pico is. We need an
ultra
> > simple console text editor just like we need ultra simple gui text
> > editors like gedit. Like I said, I'm an emacs user but if I just
want to
> > change one line in a config file at the console I really don't
want to
> > be bothered firing it up. I'd rather start something tiny and
simple.
> > (And oh boy I have I just given ammunition to the "Vi is better
than
> > Emacs" crowd. Can we please not go there?)
>
> Use joe:
>
> it's being maintained
> it's in the red hat tree for a long time
> it's used by alan cox and I wonder if that's why it's in rhl :)
> it's 284K total, installed
> it has built in keybindings for:
> emacs, wordstar and pico.
>
> run jmacs, jstar or jpico
> or just run joe and learn it's bindings.
>
> it's a great, simple, REALLY lightweight editor.
>
Hmm, I need to try jpico.
Another great editor is GNU Nano. Unfortunately it's not included in
Red Hat Linux 9 but there are RFE's filed to include it in future
versions. It is a fully-functional workalike of pico, but it's
written
completely from scratch and is GPLd, so it has none of the license
problems of pico itself.
Now, we just need a GPL'd pine clone... ;-)
--Jeremy
--
/=====================================================================\
| Jeremy Portzer jeremyp@xxxxxxxxx trilug.org/~jeremy
|
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92
|
\=====================================================================/
For me vim (=vi improved) remains the best. There is a good tutorial.
