Re: [OT?]Opteron and RH a Good *home* choice?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



El miÃ, 11 de 06 de 2003 a las 04:09, Warren Togami escribiÃ:
> On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 21:52, M. Fioretti wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 21:11:56 at 09:11:56PM -1000, Warren Togami (warren@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > AMD isn't kidding when they claim to be the fastest 32bit servers on the
> > > market.  Think of it as Athlon on steroids, not very expensive, and with
> > > 64bit room to grow later with only a software upgrade.
> > 
> > What about power consumption and noise? Not depending by Red Hat, of
> > course, but really important for home use.
> > 
> > Opteron is not the way to go from this point of view, or is it?
> 
> According to xbitlabs  or aces hardware (don't remember which) they
> *think* it is actually lower than Athlon power consumption, but I
> haven't seen any other articles about it.
> 
> You may want to wait for Athlon 64 instead for home use.  Opteron isn't
> quite available with AGP slots yet.
> 
> Warren
> 



Nvidia released a new nforce3 chipset for opteron processors 
so i think opteron will be working on the desktops soon

mmmmmm opteron




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux