So long as you dont want to do anything more than serve files from a normal public solo ftp, if you want to rate limit per domain or run Virt's vstfp is aload of shite, we removed it and went back to proftpd. testing on our network showed vsftpd as no more faster than it, secure? this has been done to death in other threads, just because it says its secure means nothing, all software is secure.......untill the first exploit is found.
By your statements, vsftpd is secure, while wu-ftpd and proftpd are not. There are no known exploits for vsftpd, there are lots of exploits for the other two. It appears you have successfully proven the opposition's argument... congratulations.
Speed? Until and unless large-scale, objective benchmark tests are run and published, "A or B is faster" is pretty much your own opinion. You think it's slower, I think it's faster. You don't give a damn what I think, I don't give a damn what you think. Arguing is stupid. QED.
-- Rodolfo J. Paiz rpaiz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
