Re: anyone with new vmware install/config to share?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Second, and final, post on this.

On Fri, 2003-04-18 at 22:54, D. D. Brierton wrote:
> Okay. This is my first update, of hopefully two. This is just about
> VMware Workstation 4.0 on RHL9. The install (via RPM) is fine, the perl
> configure script seems fine, and I have observed no problems. Unless you
> really know what you are doing, you will be best off disabling RHL9's
> samba and just using what comes with VMware, unless you have specialised
> needs, in which case you probably don't need any help from me.

I just wanted to underline this again. From my experience if you are
doing a fresh install and starting from scratch there doesn't seem to be
any grounds for hesitancy.

> However, upgrading from a previous version of VMware is messy and
> complicated, and I will give more details in my next email when (or
> pessimistically if) I overcome them.

It turns out that it isn't really that messy at all. Most of the
complications were easily resolved at my end.

> The one thing I did notice was that
> the perl configure script asked me if i wanted to keep my previous
> settings, to which I said yes, and yet somehow it didn't. The samba
> settings seem to have been hosed, whilst the NAT settings were
> preserved; and even more weirdly, it seems (although I haven't
> determined this for certain) that vmnet1 and vmnet8 were swapped around
> (one was supposed to be the NAT network for sharing my internet
> connection and the other was supposed to be the samba network): the only
> VM that had both had internet access but no samba access, and the other
> VMs which were only supposed to have internet access via NAT didn't.

No VMware did not swap vmnet1 and vmnet8, I just had to make them
trusted devices in redhat-config-securitylevel. My original samba
settings were not preserved, but simply copying back my old config had
the desired effect. One complication was that I couldn't log in to samba
because my UID from my old Samba smbpasswd file did not match my UID on
my fresh RHL9 install. A simple edit of
/etc/vmware/vmnet1/smb/private/smbpasswd did the trick.

> Upgrading the VMs to the new Virtual Hardware is a complicated process,
> and so far has not worked properly. I'll give more details in my next
> post, whenever that may be.

Actually this is not that difficult, but you really need to follow the
instructions here:

http://www.vmware.com/support/ws4/doc/upgrade_lin_ws.html

to the letter. The first VM I tried to upgrade without paying proper
attention to the instructions and I hosed it. Thankfully I had a backup
of it, and so simply deleted and started again, and once I followed the
instructions it was fine.

QUICK REVIEW OF VMWARE WORKSTATION 4.0:

Pros:

      * new interface is much nicer than the old
      * new virtual hardware makes for dramatic improvements in
        multimedia in guest OSs

Cons:

      * I can't get the virtual USB interface to work: none of my VMs
        recognise the locally connected USB printer

I hope this is a help to some of you, and not just noise on the list!

Best, Darren

-- 
=====================================================================
D. D. Brierton            darren@xxxxxxxxxxx          www.dzr-web.com
       Trying is the first step towards failure (Homer Simpson)
=====================================================================





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux