See, that it is where you are wrong... The tendency in the Linux world is that it is ALWAYS the users fault. It is an attitude of "it works for me, wohoo! Tough luck it doesn't work for you. It works for me, so therefore, you must be stupid." Not real friendly to new folks on the block around here. Lacy Moore, Project Administrator Moore & Moore General Contractors, Inc. www.mmgc.com -----Original Message----- From: Colburn [mailto:kd4e@xxxxxxxx] Posted At: Saturday, April 19, 2003 4:29 PM Posted To: Shrike Conversation: RH9 -- The Good, The Bad, & The Ugly Subject: Re: RH9 -- The Good, The Bad, & The Ugly Read my post again, this time with the arrogant attitude toggled off. I stated very clearly that IT WORKED the first time. That means that there is NOT a conflict between RH9 and my hardware, it is obviously a problem with RH9 failing to recognize the exact same hardware from one clean load to the next. The knee-jerk tendency to blame the user is a M$ attitude -- it is unwelcome in the Linux world. doc > The fact that others have no problems and you do means that your last line > is worthless hyperbolic invective. > > Regardless, have you done the simple thing and ensured "PNP aware OS" or > equivalent switch has been turned off in your mb BIOS? > > jb -- Shrike-list mailing list Shrike-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/shrike-list
