Anyone notice the US one is out of date? Am I right thinking the mirror has not caught up yet? On Wed, 2003-04-16 at 19:33, Mike Vanecek wrote: > This got lost in the black hole of the ether ... try again. > > On Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:47:42 -0400 (EDT), William Hooper wrote > > Mike Vanecek said: > > > On 14 Apr 2003 14:45:21 +1000, Michael Wardle wrote > > >> On Mon, 2003-04-14 at 13:56, R Sanchez wrote: > > >> > I've downloaded redhat 9 iso's. I wanted the docs too but there are 3 > > >> iso in > > >> > the directory. Which one should I download (i.e. what does each iso > > >> > contain?). > > >> > > >> This has been answered at least twice on this list already: > > >> https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/shrike-list/2003-April/001184.html > > > > > > > > > Slightly different queation, but why is it that Redhat is not making > > > > > > shrike-docs-APAC.iso > > > shrike-docs-EMEA.iso > > > shrike-docs-US.iso > > > > > > available via paid RHN ISO downloads or at > > > > > > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/9/en/iso/i386/? > > > > > > Best I can tell, one must go to a mirror site to find it/them. > > > > > > > I don't know anything about RHN availability, but aren't they > > available at ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/9/en/iso/doc/ > > (I can't get there to find out)? > > Finally got there and they are there. > > > This is the directory structure for the mirrors > > ftp://sunsite.dk/mirrors/redhat/9/en/iso/doc/ > > > > It stands to reason that the docs aren't i386 specific... > > Thank you. Absolutely. > > Mike. > >
