RE: Red Hat EW Licensing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2003-04-10 at 15:24, Michael Brown wrote:
> When I asked that exact question of an account manager at a dog&pony show
> they did with Oracle at Redhat's main office, the response was that the
> SRPMs are GPL, but the binary distribution is not.  AS was being licensed
> for one year at a time for a single computer at a time.

Of course that account manager is fully ignorant that what he's saying
is not only not true, but also illegal under international copyright law
for most software included in RedHat's colletions  :)

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux