On Wed, 2003-04-09 at 20:31, Ed Wilts wrote: > On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 09:25:32AM +0000, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote: > > You do have the usual Free Software rights to copy the updates on all > > the Free Software, HOWEVER, you have agreed not to do that. If you are > > caught, RedHat may cancel your subscription. > > Red Hat does not have the legal right to restrict redistribution of > either the binaries or source for GPL'd packages. They do, if you agree to allow them to do so. The subscriptions on those product lines have such conditions: read them and you will learn that I'm talking truth. Besides, I have also been on the phone with a very nice lady from RedHat France who, unfortunately, confirmed this :| > > Couldn't RedHat just make a subscription plan like this? You pay for 5 > > years of EoL on updates. Period. No hotline nothing. It's just a > > different plan targeted to experienced admins who only want to save some > > time by not having to prepare the packages themselves. > > That's pretty much what those basic versions are. For $349/year, you get > the ES subscription. You get 90 days of installation support, but > that's it. No telephone support is included. Yes, but PER MACHINE :) Thanks, but no thanks. Rui -- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi + So let's do it...? Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
