Re: More bugs in 9 than 8.1-3? Samba DoS, Mozilla, Prelink problems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11 Apr 2003 14:17:55 -0400, Benjamin Vander Jagt wrote:

> > not suprised you never tried 8.1  cause it has never existed.
> 
> Okay okay, I mean Phoebe.  I had guessed 8.1 beta would become 8.1, so I
> got into the habit of calling it 8.1.  When I refer to "8.1", I mean
> Phoebe, which was beta to 9.

There never was an "8.1 beta". Actually, the three "Phoebe" public
beta versions were 8.0.92, 8.0.93 and 8.0.94. *But* the three public
beta versions prior to Red Hat Linux 8.0 were 7.3.92, 7.3.93 and
7.3.94 (two times Limbo, then (null)). And based on the API- and ABI
incompatibilities with 7.3, hardly anybody assumed those beta
versions would turn into a 7.4 release. With 8.0.9x, however, many
beta testers (and even Red Hat employees) did not estimate how Red
Hat would handle the incompatibilities caused by NPTL. Most parts of
the beta versions looked very much like it could become a 8.1
release, indeed.

- -- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+lxaw0iMVcrivHFQRAgLbAJ9gPD8DobJD4SlHLv1Tt7zOxqSEbQCfeZhz
hBb79aIQCJ8ZgaXNftO20yc=
=k3B2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Centos Users]     [Kernel Development]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat Phoebe Beta]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Fedora Discussion]     [Gimp]     [Stuff]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux