On Fri, 2003-04-11 at 10:31, Rodolfo J. Paiz wrote: > I should also note that you have only mentioned cost-related issues, which > are independent from "security consciousness". Given that the BitTorrent > code is Open Source, and can/has been freely audited by lots of people, > then I should expect that an RH-sponsored BitTorrent would not pose any > significant security risks to the consumer. Opening any more ports than I hvae to is a security risk, regardless of whether or not that port is used by "audited" code. -- Shawn <drevil@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://www.warpcore.org/
