On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 04:37:20PM +0100, M A Young wrote: > On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > But the one thats _REALLY_ got my going "hrmmmmm!" is this one (which has no > > entry in the man page, nor the Changelog file): > > > > --upgrade-to-release=<release-version> > > Upgrade to the channel specified > > > > Is this what I think it is? A support (but hidden) way of doing dist version > > upgrades with up2date?! <que angels>HAAAAAALLELUJAH!</angels> > > Presumably. Though they aren't going out of their way to publicize it, so > I would wonder if it is supported yet. Unofficially, it's not supported (since I don't work for nor speak for Red Hat) but that's what I've heard. All it basically does is replace what some other people have done in the past by upgrading redhat-release - you get access to the channel for the new release and take your chances with rpm doing the right thing on the package upgrade. This will not be the same thing as putting the CD in and doing a normal upgrade. Those who try the new option may be in for some very unpleasant surprises if something like glibc changes between releases. When that dependency check happens and you start sucking down those updates, you could be there awhile.... You request one package update from the new version and you'll find yourself updating a thousand packages :-( -- Ed Wilts, Mounds View, MN, USA mailto:ewilts@xxxxxxxxxx Member #1, Red Hat Community Ambassador Program
