This one time, at band camp, Keith Winston <kwinston@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Gordon Messmer wrote: > > > > The Pine license doesn't allow anyone to distribute modified packages, > > which means that Red Hat can't publish a security update until UW does. > > That's not an acceptable, or Free, license. > > BTW, while I don't know of a GPL pine clone, there is a very fine GPL > pico clone called nano: > > http://www.nano-editor.org/ > > I've been using it since before version 1.0 and it has a few features > that pico doesn't. Pico is also available without pine Kevin -- ______ (_____ \ _____) ) ____ ____ ____ ____ | ____/ / _ ) / _ | / ___) / _ ) | | ( (/ / ( ( | |( (___ ( (/ / |_| \____) \_||_| \____) \____) Kevin Waterson Port Macquarie, Australia -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
