Re: Ext3 File System Check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Don't feed the trolls.  It only encourages them.

On Saturday 08 March 2003 02:20 pm, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Mar 2003 04:37:56 -0500, John Lowell wrote:
> 
> > Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> > >What's the question? Why do you see need to use option -j?
> > >
> > >Run "fsck /dev/xxx" and see. Recent versions of e2fsprogs would 
hide the journal
> > >anyway.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > Let me see if I can be helpful to you here, Mr. Schwendt.
> 
> Really helpful would be to just read the manual. Also helpful would
> be if you explained what makes you believe you must use option -j in
> the way you presented it. That would give us subscribers a better
> picture of what you've been trying to achieve. There are other fsck
> options which make sense when checking a file system. You don't want
> to miss them.
> 
> > The question
> > initially and now has simply been whether or not the right command 
to
> > run a file system check on an ext3 file system is e2fsck -j 
/dev/xxxx,
> > one answered simply enough with a yes or a no, and, if with a no, 
with
> > an indication of the proper command.
> 
> A brief look at "e2fsck --help" would tell you that your
> command-line is a syntax error.
> 
> Running that command would give an error and print the command's
> syntax description and options overview.
> 
> > The marvelous economy involved in
> > employing a  proceedure of this kind would seem to have escaped 
you. As
> > earlier I'd mentioned to you that I wasn't much for tolerating 
abuse,
> > know further that I'm equally averse to "answers" that suggest 
that I
> > might learn through experimentation. If you have an answer to 
bring to
> > my question, bring it, otherwise spare me further messages kindly.
> 
> This is nonsense. If I were a troll and answered "yes" to your
> initial question, would you run the command without verifying that
> it doesn't wipe your data? The man page is where you can check what
> the command would do.
> 
> If you don't want to use "fsck /dev/xx", that's your problem.
> 
> --
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Psyche-list mailing list
> Psyche-list@redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
> 
> 

-- 
Stephen Carville http://www.heronforge.net/~stephen/gnupgkey.txt
===========================================
The difference between robbery and taxes is simple:   The first is 
someone threatening to hurt you if you do not give them your money.   
The second is legal.



-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux