On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 04:37:56AM -0500, John Lowell wrote: > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > >What's the question? Why do you see need to use option -j? > > > >Run "fsck /dev/xxx" and see. Recent versions of e2fsprogs would hide the journal > >anyway. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me see if I can be helpful to you here, Mr. Schwendt. The question > initially and now has simply been whether or not the right command to > run a file system check on an ext3 file system is e2fsck -j /dev/xxxx, > one answered simply enough with a yes or a no, and, if with a no, with > an indication of the proper command. The marvelous economy involved in > employing a proceedure of this kind would seem to have escaped you. As > earlier I'd mentioned to you that I wasn't much for tolerating abuse, > know further that I'm equally averse to "answers" that suggest that I > might learn through experimentation. If you have an answer to bring to > my question, bring it, otherwise spare me further messages kindly. > > John Lowell > Ok the command should be: e2fsck -p /dev/xxxx or e2fsck -y /dev/xxxx ------------------------------------------- Aaron Konstam Computer Science Trinity University 715 Stadium Dr. San Antonio, TX 78212-7200 telephone: (210)-999-7484 email:akonstam@trinity.edu -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
