Re: Dist. Suggestions From: Joe Klemmer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>  > You remind me of every other SIMPSONS COMIC BOOK STORE LOOKING GUY
> that holds linux back.
>
>  >	It seems to me that you are not satisfied with RH the
>  >distro and RH the company.  If this is true then I don't understand
> your continuation of this pointless and counterproductive discussion.
>
> Amen Joe!   David: If you do not like the philosophy and goals the Red
> Hat employees explain, on this mailing  list and in interviews published
>  and linked to from the Red Hat web site, you should look for another
> distro. Obviously, a x.0 release is almost guaranteed to be very
> different and problematic. Maybe you should try Mandrake or Slackware or
>  some other distro. All of them have their problems. No OS is perfect
> and  no major packages are perfect. I started out intending to use
> Mandrake  7.2 (I bought a boxed set) and I also installed 2 or 3 later
> versions of  Mandrake, but I did *NOT* like their installation routine,
> which skipped  past the step of making a boot disk and explained that I
> could set up an  account for "root" without needing a password. Things
> like that seem  very unprofessional to me. The people at Red Hat know
> Psyche isn't  perfect (what is ?) and the next versions will be better.
> I'm a Newbie,  and Joe is a Guru, but we both believe Red Hat is the
> best way for us to  go. Maybe another distro would be the best way for
> you to enjoy Linux. GL, Lanny

This thread is a bit dead, but I will respond anyways.

If you refer to the original post, and the side thread "Mistating
the problems w/ 8.0"

You will see its not RH I am disapointed in, or 8.0.
I had made a suggestion for RH to include some software
on a seperated CD from the main distro, software in my eyes
will make the RH distro much better.

The software I asked for consideration was,
Novell NDS
JAVA
TOMCAT
and some more wireless NIC drivers specifically prism2_cs and the prism2
driver which are under the MPL and by the most strict interpretation of
the GPL, you can not distribute software that is NON-GPL on the same
media as GPL software.
This is why I suggested a seperate OPTIONAL CD.
The above comments that I made were in response to a post that
I feel was un-called for by a RH employee comparing my post to a root canal.





-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux