> On Saturday 23 November 2002 18:50, jdow uttered: >> Indeed, he is in a position to REQUEST. He is not in a position to >> demand. He is apparently too inexperienced with the world to have >> learned the difference. Incidentally, Red Hat's attidude about modules >> for which no source is available, such as nvidia drivers, is the same >> as that of the Linux Kernel developers. If they cannot get their >> fingers into the code themselves to fix what may be broken they want >> nothing to do with it and indeed mark it as unfit for consumption or >> at least unfit for support queries, complaints, bug reports, or even >> toilet paper. > > Hell, if Linus had his way, the Linux kernel would _not_ run non-gpl > code period. There is a big heated argument over LSM right now, where > Linus is forcing a patch that keeps LSM from loading closed source > modules, and thus threatening the financial stability of a few security > vendors... > > Be glad, dear twit, that you even have ability to run closed-source > modules currently. It could change, and then who would you bitch at? Once again, someone that didn't read the ORIGINAL POST and still thinks the driver I asked for is a CLOSED SOURCE DRIVER. Ha!!!!! -- Psyche-list mailing list Psyche-list@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list
