Re: A few things who still suck in RedHat 8 aka constructive criticism

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Great.
Not to be a dick but.
I think RH has done a great thing for the overall MARKET in 8.0.

But what RH needs to remember and I think what I see you are angry at
is that 8.0 is not for you and not for the typical LINUX user.

But by no means is 8.0 NOT Linux, in fact I think it is the embodiment
of what LINUX really is.  What I mean by that is that they exercised
they're right to MODIFY something to achieve the desire.

I think to appease more users RH needs to come out w/ a TECHNICAL &
NON-TECHNICAL distribution.



> On Friday 22 November 2002 11:58 am, Jean Francois Martinez wrote:
>
> Let's see, I am stuck trying to install kdeadmin and koffice from
> source, and  I am finding that RH has customized things so that we
> either have to use the  RH version of KDE, or forget it.
>
> As far as I am concerned:
>
> RH broke the beauty of Linux. And the beauty of RH, which was real linux
> until  recently.
>
> I'm off shopping for Mandrake 9.0 tommorrow.
>
> --
> Rob Blomquist
> Kirkland, WA
>
> On the side of the software box, in the 'System Requirements' section,
> it said  'Requires Windows 95 or better'. So I installed Linux and lived
> happily ever  after.
>
>
>
> --
> Psyche-list mailing list
> Psyche-list@redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list





-- 
Psyche-list mailing list
Psyche-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/psyche-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Red Hat General Discussion]     [Centos]     [Kernel]     [Red Hat Install]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux