--- "Gene C." <czar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Monday 01 December 2003 09:23, Alex Deucher wrote: > > --- "Gene C." <czar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > <snip> > > > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 01:00:0 > > > (--) Assigning device section with no busID to primary device > > > (WW) RADEON: No matching Device section for instance (BusID > > > PCI:1:0:1) found > > > > You can ignore this. Newer radeon adapters have a secondary ID as > a > > flag for the windows drivers, but the xfree86 driver doesn't need > it. > > Good news! Thanks. > > > > > > (--) Chipset ATI Radeon 9200 5964 (AGP) found > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >---------------- > > > > > 1. Should I put this info into bugzilla? > > > > Put what into bugzilla? What problem are you having? > > Well, Mike Harris usually perfers bugzilla reports for any "problem". > IIRC, > he has requested that un-recognized chipids be reported. > > While XFree86 itself seems to recognize the card, neither anaconda > (the > installer) nor the redhat-config-xfree86 tool recognize it. > redhat needs to update it's tools then. xfree86 should be fine. > > > > > 2. Any tips or things I should try to get it to work "better" ... > it > > > works OK > > > not for the limited use I need. > > > > Can you elaborate? what do you mean by "better?" > > Since I was not sure the adapter was being recognized properly by > XFree86, I > was wondering about faking it with another some other chipid. it's not needed. the useless secondary id's have been removed from the radeon driver and all new chip ids for recent radeon cards should be in cvs now and will be available in xfree86 4.4 which will be released very soon now. Alex __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree _______________________________________________ xfree86-list mailing list xfree86-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/xfree86-list IRC: #xfree86 on irc.redhat.com
