Re: 4.3.0-5 patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--- Mark Knecht <markknecht@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-04-28 at 09:58, Aaron Wade wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have a radeon 9000 on RH 9 and I just installed the 4.3.0-5 patch
> to try to 
> > get my xinerama config working.  unfortunately it didn't quite do
> the trick.  
> > It must be somewhere in my config.  I have pasted the config here
> for people 
> > to look over.  What I have found odd, is that when I check the
> XFree86.0.log 
> > file it is complaining about PCI:1:5:1 which it has never done.  I
> have tried 
> > to edit the configuration for that device and nothing has changed. 
> 
> > Anyone have words of wisdom ?
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > ---snip---
> > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 01:05:0
> > (WW) RADEON: No matching Device section for instance (BusID
> PCI:1:5:1) found
> > --snip--
> 
> I'm seeing something similar also:
> 
> (II) Primary Device is: PCI 01:00:0
> (--) Assigning device section with no busID to primary device
> (WW) RADEON: No matching Device section for instance (BusID
> PCI:1:0:1)
> found
> 
> They two pieces seem to  correspond to the lspci info. I presume the
> Radeon 9000 muct be a multifunction device:
> 
> [root@xxxxxxxxx root]# lspci
> <SNIP>
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R250
> If
> [Radeon 9000] (rev 01)
> 01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R250 [Radeon
> 9000] (Secondary) (rev 01)
> <SNIP>
> 
> OK, I don't use the dual head stuff, but I sort of wonder about one
> thing in your config file:
> 
> <SNIP>
> 
> > 
> > Section "Device"
> > 	Identifier  "Radeon-vga"
> > 	Driver      "radeon"
> > 	VendorName  "Videocard vendor"
> > 	BoardName   "ATI Radeon 9000"
> > 	BusID       "PCI:1:5:0"
> > 	Screen	0
> > EndSection
> > Section "Device"
> > 	Identifier "Radeon-dvi"
> > 	Driver     "radeon"
> > 	VendorName "Videocard vendor"
> > 	BoardName  "Ati Radeon 9000"
> > 	BusID      "PCI:1:5:0"

based on your lspci, shouldn't these be PCI:1:0:0?


> > 	Screen     1
> > EndSection
> > 
> > 
> 
> <SNIP>
> 
> Should the second of these two maybe use PCI:1:5:1?
> 
> BEWARE!! I have ZERO experience in this area!!
> 
> Cheers,
> Mark
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com



_______________________________________________
xfree86-list mailing list
xfree86-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/xfree86-list
IRC: #xfree86 on irc.redhat.com

[Red Hat General]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Kernel Development]     [Yosemite Camping]

  Powered by Linux