On Mon, 2003-04-28 at 09:58, Aaron Wade wrote: > Hi, > I have a radeon 9000 on RH 9 and I just installed the 4.3.0-5 patch to try to > get my xinerama config working. unfortunately it didn't quite do the trick. > It must be somewhere in my config. I have pasted the config here for people > to look over. What I have found odd, is that when I check the XFree86.0.log > file it is complaining about PCI:1:5:1 which it has never done. I have tried > to edit the configuration for that device and nothing has changed. > Anyone have words of wisdom ? > > Thanks. > > ---snip--- > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 01:05:0 > (WW) RADEON: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:1:5:1) found > --snip-- I'm seeing something similar also: (II) Primary Device is: PCI 01:00:0 (--) Assigning device section with no busID to primary device (WW) RADEON: No matching Device section for instance (BusID PCI:1:0:1) found They two pieces seem to correspond to the lspci info. I presume the Radeon 9000 muct be a multifunction device: [root@xxxxxxxxx root]# lspci <SNIP> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R250 If [Radeon 9000] (rev 01) 01:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R250 [Radeon 9000] (Secondary) (rev 01) <SNIP> OK, I don't use the dual head stuff, but I sort of wonder about one thing in your config file: <SNIP> > > Section "Device" > Identifier "Radeon-vga" > Driver "radeon" > VendorName "Videocard vendor" > BoardName "ATI Radeon 9000" > BusID "PCI:1:5:0" > Screen 0 > EndSection > Section "Device" > Identifier "Radeon-dvi" > Driver "radeon" > VendorName "Videocard vendor" > BoardName "Ati Radeon 9000" > BusID "PCI:1:5:0" > Screen 1 > EndSection > > <SNIP> Should the second of these two maybe use PCI:1:5:1? BEWARE!! I have ZERO experience in this area!! Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ xfree86-list mailing list xfree86-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/xfree86-list IRC: #xfree86 on irc.redhat.com
