Re: Is it time to remove reiserfs?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon 04-04-22 12:58:28, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > So maybe you're right and there are still a bit more than expected out
> > there. However I really think that most users who still have one are in
> > the same situation as I am, they're not aware of it. So aside big fat
> > warnings at mount time (possibly with an extra delay), there's nothing
> > that will make that situation change.
> > 
> > At the very least disabling it by default in Kconfig and in distros
> > should be effective. I really don't think that there are still users
> > who regularly update their system and who have it on their rootfs, but
> > still having data on it, yes, possibly. The earlier they're warned,
> > the better.
> I guess we should start by making sure that distributions don't use it
> by default. Big fat warning + delay is a bit harsh for that, talking
> to them should be enough at this point :-).
> Someone start with Arch Linux ARM.

Yeah, I will write them and CC you. Thanks for notifying me.

Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>

[Index of Archives]     [Linux File System Development]     [Linux BTRFS]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Ext4 Filesystem]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Resources]

  Powered by Linux