Hello! On Mon 04-04-22 12:58:28, Pavel Machek wrote: > > So maybe you're right and there are still a bit more than expected out > > there. However I really think that most users who still have one are in > > the same situation as I am, they're not aware of it. So aside big fat > > warnings at mount time (possibly with an extra delay), there's nothing > > that will make that situation change. > > > > At the very least disabling it by default in Kconfig and in distros > > should be effective. I really don't think that there are still users > > who regularly update their system and who have it on their rootfs, but > > still having data on it, yes, possibly. The earlier they're warned, > > the better. > > I guess we should start by making sure that distributions don't use it > by default. Big fat warning + delay is a bit harsh for that, talking > to them should be enough at this point :-). > > Someone start with Arch Linux ARM. Yeah, I will write them and CC you. Thanks for notifying me. Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR
