Hi! > > But I believe userbase is bigger than you think and it will not be > > possible to remove reiserfs anytime soon. > > I was about to say the opposite until I noticed that one of my main > dev machine has its kernel git dir on it because it's an old FS from > a previous instance of this machine before an upgrade and it turns out > that this FS still had lots of available space to store git trees > :-/ :-). > So maybe you're right and there are still a bit more than expected out > there. However I really think that most users who still have one are in > the same situation as I am, they're not aware of it. So aside big fat > warnings at mount time (possibly with an extra delay), there's nothing > that will make that situation change. > > At the very least disabling it by default in Kconfig and in distros > should be effective. I really don't think that there are still users > who regularly update their system and who have it on their rootfs, but > still having data on it, yes, possibly. The earlier they're warned, > the better. I guess we should start by making sure that distributions don't use it by default. Big fat warning + delay is a bit harsh for that, talking to them should be enough at this point :-). Someone start with Arch Linux ARM. Pavel -- People of Russia, stop Putin before his war on Ukraine escalates.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
