On 18 September 2013 00:25, Chris Gentile <cnjgentile@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Very interesting, is the BLD faster for you? To be clear, BLD is not process scheduller. It's load distribution technique with works with any process scheduller you prefer. > the new 442 BFS doesn't seem buggy whatsoever fyi if you haven't tested it Ok, I'll test it. Thanks for hint. Let's continue discuss reiser4 (not alternative patches of something like that) otherwise somebody kick us from here :) > > > On 09/17/2013 09:22 PM, Evgeniy wrote: >> On 18 September 2013 00:15, Chris Gentile <cnjgentile@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> unny you should mention those specific patches, I use the 3.11 kernels with >>> exactly all the same patches with the exception of the BLD patch because I >>> don't know how it could work in conjunction with the CK1 BFS scheduler? >> Actually I don't use BFS scheduller because it's buggy. Usually I >> apply CK patch and switch off BFS in kernel configuration settings. As >> far as I remember, BLD works fine with BFS. >> >>> Or are you using different schedulers on different servers depending on workload type? >> Yes, exactly. >> >> Thanks for patch. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
