Very interesting, is the BLD faster for you? the new 442 BFS doesn't seem buggy whatsoever fyi if you haven't tested it On 09/17/2013 09:22 PM, Evgeniy wrote: > On 18 September 2013 00:15, Chris Gentile <cnjgentile@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> unny you should mention those specific patches, I use the 3.11 kernels with >> exactly all the same patches with the exception of the BLD patch because I >> don't know how it could work in conjunction with the CK1 BFS scheduler? > Actually I don't use BFS scheduller because it's buggy. Usually I > apply CK patch and switch off BFS in kernel configuration settings. As > far as I remember, BLD works fine with BFS. > >> Or are you using different schedulers on different servers depending on workload type? > Yes, exactly. > > Thanks for patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
