On 17 September 2013 23:37, Chris Gentile <cnjgentile@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Evgeniy, > > I'm the only "tester" so our group would be two... the rest are real > developers :) > > Works great on 3.11.1 kernel so far, hoping it can work soon on 3.12's > but the devs will most likely wait until the official release. It should work with 3.12's in case there aren't changes in VFS. Send me please R4 patch for 3.11.1 kernel. > It's cool that you saw some of the messages, we need to get Reiser4 back > on the map in the mainstream ---- it's public image has been skewed as > you know by publications re: the story of Hans Reiser. i personally > could not care what happened with all that , it's terrible, but we're > focusing on a filesystem here. The more people we can get interested > the better so we can get R4 in mainline. I totally agree with you. > Thanks!! Let me introduse a little bit my test environment. Currently I use Gentoo linux with kernel-3.10.12 which inlude patches: reiser4 bfq (Budget Fair Queueing Budget I/O Scheduler) bld (Alternate CPU load distribution technique for Linux kernel scheduler) ck (Con Kolivas' high performance patchset) optimization (Kernel patch enables gcc optimizations for additional CPUs) uksm (Use Ultra Kernel Samepage Merging patches) LTO optimization (http://github.com/andikleen/linux-misc) I use such kernels on all my high load servers and it shows significant performance over default kernel. Thanks, > Chris > > > > On 09/17/2013 08:24 PM, Evgeniy wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I'm a active user of reiser4 filesystem. Currently I use it with LZO >> compression for Magento cache store. Let me join in your small team of >> testers of this beautiful fs :) >> >> Regarding collaboration tool, I think the best idea to use GitHub. >> It's the most user friendly IMHO. >> >> Also I'd like to ask about reiser4 over soft raid0. If I have raid0 >> chunk size 4K, what is optimal cluster size of reiser4 fs? >> >> P.S: It would be perfect to implement Snappy compression algo >> https://code.google.com/p/snappy/. According to tests it has advantage >> over LZO. >> >> Thanks, >> >> On 17 September 2013 22:52, Edward Shishkin <edward.shishkin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 09/17/2013 08:15 PM, Mathieu Belanger wrote: >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I made reiser4 for kernel 3.11-rc4 patchs some time ago and I did not >>>> publish them due to a small issue I got with them and did not have time to >>>> debug it. >>> >>> >>> Yeah, it's a pity... >>> >>> >>> >>>> I think it would be a good idea to have a GIT or any kind of work >>>> collaboration tool so people don't redo what other people do on there side >>>> but instead do it in a way so other can see and fix/improve it faster. >>>> >>>> I think that the best way would be to put the last vanilla patched with >>>> reiser4 and work on it that way (so it's will be simple to simply generate >>>> the reiser4 patch from the git + vanilla) >>> >>> >>> It must be a good idea... >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Edward. >>> >>> >>>> I can set it up tonight (will update my patch to the latest 3.11, instead >>>> of rc4, in the same time). >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Mathieu Belanger >>> >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
