On January 28, 2004 08:49 pm, Robert Eden wrote: > --- Pete Nesbitt <pete@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On January 28, 2004 11:49 am, Robert Eden wrote: > > Just a few thoughts on this. I hope you are aware of security > > implications of using "no_root_squash". > > Oh Yes.. We're a small company and don't worry too much about our > internal security.. most folks know root anyway.. Critical systems are > separate and secure.. might as well let the developers play! > > > You may have tried this, but just in case, the rw size should be set > > in fstab to "rsize=8192,wsize=8192". > > Yup.. tried it.. no difference. > > > Is there any nfs version diffs. > > RH 7.2 mountd -v reports nfs_utils 0.3.3 > RH 9 mountd -v reports nfs_utils 1.0.1 > > > Have a look at fstab in the 2 linux systems, see if the anything is > > different. > > nope... I actually didn't use vfstab, but mount directly. /etc/mnttab > reported the same when mounted. > > This is really a stumper! The 7.2 system is actually a little flakey. > I want to move everything off it so I can reload it. > > Robert > Have you looked/captured tcpdump? Do sftp and scf work properly between them? ?? -- Pete Nesbitt, rhce -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
