--- Pete Nesbitt <pete@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On January 28, 2004 11:49 am, Robert Eden wrote: > Just a few thoughts on this. I hope you are aware of security > implications of using "no_root_squash". Oh Yes.. We're a small company and don't worry too much about our internal security.. most folks know root anyway.. Critical systems are separate and secure.. might as well let the developers play! > You may have tried this, but just in case, the rw size should be set > in fstab to "rsize=8192,wsize=8192". Yup.. tried it.. no difference. > Is there any nfs version diffs. RH 7.2 mountd -v reports nfs_utils 0.3.3 RH 9 mountd -v reports nfs_utils 1.0.1 > Have a look at fstab in the 2 linux systems, see if the anything is > different. nope... I actually didn't use vfstab, but mount directly. /etc/mnttab reported the same when mounted. This is really a stumper! The 7.2 system is actually a little flakey. I want to move everything off it so I can reload it. Robert __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it! http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/ -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
