Re: RH9 NFS slow, RH7.2 works fine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On January 28, 2004 11:49 am, Robert Eden wrote:
> I have three systems:
>
> sys1: RH9
> sys2: RH7.2
> sys3: Solaris 8
>
> sys1 and sys2 have local file systems shared
> /etc/exports:
>      /disk/sys1-nfs1 *(rw,insecure,no_root_squash,async)
>
> I have created ~100MB file on sys1,sys2
>     dd if=/dev/zero of=zero.tmp bs=1000 count=100000
>
> I mount the remote file systems and try copying the ~100MB file
>
> sys1 -> sys3 : unknown (stopped after 6 minutes. est 105 minutes)
> sys2 -> sys3 : 10.5 seconds
> sys1 -> sys2 : 15.1 seconds
>
> Searches have found a few posts with RH9 NFS being slow, but no
> solutions.  I have tried adjusting [rw]size.
>
> any ideas?
>
> Robert
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
> http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/

Hi Robert,
Just a few thoughts on this. I hope you are aware of security implications of 
using "no_root_squash".

You may have tried this, but just incase, the rw size should be set in fstab 
to "rsize=8192,wsize=8192".

Is there any nfs version diffs. Since the Solaris box can mount and copy from 
RH 7.2, there does not appear to be a gnu vs Sun conflict (strange really:) 

Have a look at fstab in the 2 linux systems, see if the anything is different.
-- 
Pete Nesbitt, rhce


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux