Re: "Red Hat recommends Windows for consumers"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 06:18:37PM -0600, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 05:33:31PM -0400, Joe Polk wrote:
> > This was an idiotic thing to say. RH doesn't have any desktop aspirations, so
> 
> Actually,  they do.  They already have RHEL WS and Pro Workstation, and
> I know that there are other "aspirations" that they haven't completely 
> shared with the rest of us.
[...]

In my eyes, those products are in no way aimed at the type of user
this whole text is about, i.e. the average home user. I think that's
one of the reasons it feels strange to hear this from Red Had. It's
almost like backstabbing in the general direction of the likes of
Mandrake, who *are* targetting the desktop, if I want to take this to
the extreme.

Cheerio,

Thomas
-- 
==> RH List Archive: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=redhat-list&r=1&w=2 <==
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Thomas Ribbrock    http://www.ribbrock.org 
  "You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!"


-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

[Index of Archives]     [CentOS]     [Kernel Development]     [PAM]     [Fedora Users]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux Admin]     [Gimp]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Yosemite News]     [Red Hat Crash Utility]


  Powered by Linux