On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 06:18:37PM -0600, Ed Wilts wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 05:33:31PM -0400, Joe Polk wrote: > > This was an idiotic thing to say. RH doesn't have any desktop aspirations, so > > Actually, they do. They already have RHEL WS and Pro Workstation, and > I know that there are other "aspirations" that they haven't completely > shared with the rest of us. [...] In my eyes, those products are in no way aimed at the type of user this whole text is about, i.e. the average home user. I think that's one of the reasons it feels strange to hear this from Red Had. It's almost like backstabbing in the general direction of the likes of Mandrake, who *are* targetting the desktop, if I want to take this to the extreme. Cheerio, Thomas -- ==> RH List Archive: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=redhat-list&r=1&w=2 <== ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thomas Ribbrock http://www.ribbrock.org "You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!" -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list