Re: I've made a bit of a mess in my raid setup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,
I've consolidated the state of the system, these are the details:

http://pastebin.com/k7wGpw8F

Notice how /dev/md0 has the Name : petra:md1 and /dev/md1 doesn't have
any superblock. Also it appears there is an old mdadm superblock on
/dev/sda1 with my previous array configuration.

So now what I'm trying to achive is this configuration: removing the
hold partitions /dev/sda1 and /dev/sdb1 with the old superblock (by
the way how is it possible i'm using an array with /dev/sda and
/dev/sdb while these devices contains an old partition?) Configuring
correctly the raid 1 array with /dev/sdd and /dev/md0

2014-03-09 9:31 GMT+01:00 Federico Foschini <undicizeri@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Done and rebooted. I'm in the same condition as before. Also when I
> update the initrd a message said "/dev/md1 doesn't appear to be
> active"
>
> 2014-03-09 8:58 GMT+01:00 Can Jeuleers <can.jeuleers@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> On 03/08/2014 09:23 PM, Federico Foschini wrote:
>>> What is going on? Why /dev/md1 is now inactive and /dev/sdd is busy?
>>
>> I don't know Federico, but have you tried updating your initrd and
>> rebooting? So that the assembly that takes place at boot uses the same
>> configuration as it would post-boot?
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Federico Foschini.



-- 
Federico Foschini.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux