Re: Suboptimal raid6 linear read speed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 20, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sun, 20 Jan 2013, Chris Murphy wrote:
> 
>> bits" because such a rate of error is *NOT* 1 bit in 1E14 bits. It's like arguing 2+2=5 and then blabbing on for 10 minutes asserting your belief it's true.
> 
> Thanks, insult taken.

If you literally can't count, then insult intended. Otherwise, grow up, and explain your assertions, and how I'm wrong rather than just repeating yourself.

> 
> If you're not even trying to be civil, there is no point in continuing this discussion.


Classic ad hominem attack. You are making this discussion about me, about my civility, rather than about the argument. Can you demonstrate the flaw in what I've said?

Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux