Re: Suboptimal raid6 linear read speed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 18 Jan 2013, Stan Hoeppner wrote:

The probability of a URE during rebuild increases with the number and
size of the source drives being read to rebuild the failed drive.  Thus
the probability of encountering a URE in the 1:1 drive scenario is
extremely low, close to zero if you believe manufacturer specs.

For a 2TB drive and BER 10^-14 (common for non-enterprise drives), the probability is 1/6 of a single URE for a read of the entire drive.

So, no, the "URE scare" being propagated these days doesn't affect RAID1/10. If/when individual drive capacities exceed 10TB in the future, and if at that time the URE rates per drive do not improve, -then- this phenomenon will affect RAID1/10. But it does not currently with today's drives.

Let's agree to disagree.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux