Re: Suboptimal raid6 linear read speed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/19/2013 1:43 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:

> With a BER of 10^-14 you have a 16% risk of getting URE when reading an
> entire 2TB drive.

On 1/19/2013 7:21 AM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:

> ok, perhaps, maybe, but then it's 17% chance of losing data after a
> mirror or raid-5 rebuild with 2TB drives...


Where are you guys coming up with this 16-17% chance of URE on any
single full read of this 2TB, 10E14 drive?  The URE rate here is 1 bit
for every 12.5 trillion bytes.  Thus, statistically, one must read this
drive more than 6 times to encounter a URE.  Given that, how is any
single full read between the 1st and the 6th going to have a 16-17%
chance of encountering a URE for that one full read?  That doesn't make
sense.

-- 
Stan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux