John Robinson wrote:
On 02/09/2011 10:19, Pim Zandbergen wrote:
On 09/01/2011 09:41 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
I could file a bug on bugzilla.redhat.com if that would help.
Feel free, it helps me track things.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735306
I'm not sure whether it's just the --grow that should complain, or
perhaps the earlier step of
mdadm /dev/md/array-using-0.90-metadata --add /dev/3TB
should also complain (even if it'll work with less than 2TiB in use,
it ought to tell the user they won't be able to grow the array).
Perhaps Neil can confirm, but the limitation seems to be using 2TB as an
array member size, I am reasonably sure that if you had partitioned the
drives into two 1.5TB partitions you could have created the array just fine.
Note that this is just a speculation, not a suggestion to allow using
0.90 metadata, and I do realize that this array was created in the dark
ages, not being created new.
--
Bill Davidsen<davidsen@xxxxxxx>
We are not out of the woods yet, but we know the direction and have
taken the first step. The steps are many, but finite in number, and if
we persevere we will reach our destination. -me, 2010
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
