On 09/01/2011 12:12 PM, Pim Zandbergen wrote:
On 09/01/2011 05:28 PM, Pim Zandbergen wrote:
What should I do to find the cause?
Additional information:
Both the original 2TB drives as well as the new 3TB drives were GPT
formatted with partition type FD00
This is information about the currently shrunk array:
# mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Version : 0.90
Why is your raid metadata using this old version? mdadm-3.2.2-6.fc15
will not create this version of raid array by default. There is a
reason we have updated to a new superblock. Does this problem still
occur if you use a newer superblock format (one of the version 1.x
versions)?
Creation Time : Wed Feb 8 23:22:15 2006
Raid Level : raid5
Array Size : 4696690944 (4479.11 GiB 4809.41 GB)
Used Dev Size : 782781824 (746.52 GiB 801.57 GB)
This looks like some sort of sector count wrap, which might be related
to version 0.90 superblock usage. 3TB - 2.2TB (roughly the wrap point) =
800GB, which is precisely how much of each device you are using to
create a 4.8TB array.
Raid Devices : 7
Total Devices : 7
Preferred Minor : 0
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Tue Aug 30 21:50:50 2011
State : clean
Active Devices : 7
Working Devices : 7
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 0
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 64K
UUID : 1bf1b0e2:82d487c5:f6f36a45:766001d1
Events : 0.3157574
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 161 0 active sync /dev/sdk1
1 8 177 1 active sync /dev/sdl1
2 8 193 2 active sync /dev/sdm1
3 8 145 3 active sync /dev/sdj1
4 8 209 4 active sync /dev/sdn1
5 8 225 5 active sync /dev/sdo1
6 8 129 6 active sync /dev/sdi1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html