Keld Jørn Simonsen put forth on 2/4/2011 2:42 PM: >>> So apparently their Disk Data Format specification doesn't include hybrid RAID >>> levels. This makes sense, as the _on disk_ layout of RAID 10 is identical to >>> RAID 1. > > I was puzzled here. I think you mean: > > "the _on disk_ layout of RAID 10 is identical to RAID 1 and RAID 0" > > If that is what you meant, I think we agree on most things here. I set a trap for you, of sorts. ;) If what you say is true, then RAID 10 should be covered in the DDF, as migration from one device to another isn't possible without the RAID 10 on disk layout being defined in the DDF as with all the other RAID levels. True? -- Stan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
