On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 10:06:03AM +0100, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 02:27:38AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > > Keld Jørn Simonsen put forth on 2/4/2011 1:06 AM: > > > > > It looks like they do define all major basic RAID disk layouts. (except > > > raid10,f2 of cause) . RAID1+0 is a derived format, maybe that is out of > > > scope of the DDF standard. > > > > "A secondary virtual disk is a VD configured using hybrid RAID levels like > > RAID10 or RAID50. Its elements are BVDs." > > > > So apparently their Disk Data Format specification doesn't include hybrid RAID > > levels. This makes sense, as the _on disk_ layout of RAID 10 is identical to > > RAID 1. I was puzzled here. I think you mean: "the _on disk_ layout of RAID 10 is identical to RAID 1 and RAID 0" If that is what you meant, I think we agree on most things here. best regards keld -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
