Re: feature suggestion to handle read errors during re-sync of raid5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 1 Feb 2010, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:

It is true that drives do not remap on FAILED reads but that means reads so broken the ECC can not repair them. Simple bit errors that ECC can repair the OS never sees. So maybe you just never had a rewrite of a bit error give a write error?

Could be.

Since the drive has ECC, it would be interesting to see the amount of read errors ECC has corrected. Would also be interesting to know if the drive will rewrite a sector if it's ECC corrected, so that ECC doesn't have to kick in next time (or if they're actually operating in so narrow margins that they actually use the ECC constantly because the s/n ratio is bad and that this is part of the design).

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux