Re: feature suggestion to handle read errors during re-sync of raid5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 31 Jan 2010, John Robinson wrote:

iirc part of the point of moving to 4K sectors is to improve the error correction to something like 1 in 10^20 or 22 without losing storage density, partly by using what was lost before in inter-sector gaps and partly because you can do better with more bits of ECC over more data.

Frankly I wish they'd sacrificed a little storage density and improved the error rate a long time ago.

Looking at the data sheet for WD20EADS and WD20EARS they both have 10^15 "non-recoverable read errors per bits read", so at least in the data sheet nothing has really changed in the error rate aspect.

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux