Re: feature suggestion to handle read errors during re-sync of raid5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30/01/2010 17:51, Giovanni Tessore wrote:
[...]  Having the OS
recover and rewrite the sectors makes me feel back in the past, when under DOS we used PCTools and other utilities to do this recovery stuff on ST-506 drives .... and this works well on raid, but in sinlge disk configuration, shouldn't these be data loss?

I'm confused... how much are modern disks reliable?

I think the problem is that modern discs haven't got more reliable, but they have got much, much bigger; "modern" 2G discs had a read error rate of 1 bit per 10^14, and current 2T discs have the same, so while on a 2G disc you could read the whole surface of the disc tens of thousands of times before being likely to get a read error, now it's only tens of times. Someone did recently post links to a formal article analysing this subject to this list, but I can't find it :-(

Cheers,

John.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux