Re: Stupid question regarding RAID-1 access pattern

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Erno Kuusela wrote:
Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

I doubt this would help much really.  If you're reading sequential data
then it's pretty much as quick to keep reading as to seek to the next
chunk.

Only if your stripe size is smaller than your bandwidth x seek time.
Break even stripe size for 100MB/s 10ms disks would be 1 MB, so it
might work well with 4-10 MB stripes provided the IO stack is up to it?
10ms is the full stroke seek time, I suspect for smaller chunks/seeks the time would be *much* shorter...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux