Re: Stupid question regarding RAID-1 access pattern

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robin Hill <robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I doubt this would help much really.  If you're reading sequential data
> then it's pretty much as quick to keep reading as to seek to the next
> chunk.

Only if your stripe size is smaller than your bandwidth x seek time.
Break even stripe size for 100MB/s 10ms disks would be 1 MB, so it
might work well with 4-10 MB stripes provided the IO stack is up to it?

Erno

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux