Re: [ANNOUNCE] mdadm-3.1 has been withdrawn

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:07:09PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
overwrite the superblock), I wouldn't make it 1.2 for whole disk
devices, and in fact it might be wise to refuse to create 1.2
superblocks on whole disk devices.  Just a thought.
I am against refusing to do things because users could get confused,
I could agree if this would require a force flag, but not deny
completely.
I would think 1.1 is a good option for default. Better than 1.0 for
reasons we discussed to boredom, and 1.2 is really only for special
cases.
i also agree on the default chunk size bump


--
Luca Berra -- bluca@xxxxxxxxxx
         Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
  /"\
  \ /     ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
   X        AGAINST HTML MAIL
  / \
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux