Re: [ANNOUNCE] mdadm-3.1 has been withdrawn

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Jon Nelson wrote:

I've been using 1.1 for everything.  What's the current wisdom
regarding 1.0 vs 1.1 or 1.2?
I used 1.1 because that's also where filesystem metadata usually goes
and therefore one might hope that the presence of the md metadata
would prevent accidental identification of a raid volume as containing
a filesystem.

I like 1.2 because if you happen to write an MBR or something to the drive, you don't lose the superblock.

With 1.2 I can also take the drive from a 3ware hw-raid (single drive in 3ware bios) and put in a non-3ware (because the 3ware stores the superblock at the end, so when you put it in a non-3ware the end has now changed).

--
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux