On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:36 AM, berk walker <berk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Doug Ledford wrote: >> Although the cause for this sucks, I was actually going to suggest that >> since 3.1 is a version bump, that we take the opportunity to change a >> few defaults. Like switching to version 1 superblocks instead of >> version 0 by default. And changing the default chunk size to 512k >> instead of 64k. The time has simply come for the 0->1 superblock >> change, and I have a good deal of data showing that for SATA disks at >> least, the 512k chunk size is the typical sweet spot. >> > +1 +1 here, too. I've been using 1.1 for everything. What's the current wisdom regarding 1.0 vs 1.1 or 1.2? I used 1.1 because that's also where filesystem metadata usually goes and therefore one might hope that the presence of the md metadata would prevent accidental identification of a raid volume as containing a filesystem. -- Jon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
